Women

Girl Talk Part 6 - The "S" Word

submit 2.jpg

Submit

Well, you must have known if I asked a bunch of women about toxic advice they’ve been given, that the subject of submission would come up sooner or later. I got so many responses about submission, that I can’t even begin to list them all but here are a few:   

·        A Godly woman is submissive

·        Men are the provider, pursuer, and protector

·        The wife is the “helper” or “helpmeet”  to her husband

·        The man is supposed to be the “spiritual leader” of his wife

·        Be careful about intimidating men, make sure to make yourself smaller so you don't scare them away!

 ·        A woman should never ask a man on a date, because she would be seen as too forward, desperate, or intimidating.

 I’ve waited to write about the “s” word, because it’s hard to know what to say.  It’s always been interesting to me (and tragic) that religion has taken the verses on submission and weaponized them against women. 

The Bible has much to say about an attitude of submission, and the smallest amount of it is directed at women.  Some examples: 

  • Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also; and if anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well

  • Lord, if my brother sins against me, how often should I forgive? As many as seven times?” 22 Jesus said to him, “Not seven times, but, I tell you, seventy-seven times

  • A dispute also arose among them as to which of them was considered to be greatest. 25 Jesus said to them, “The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them; and those who exercise authority over them call themselves Benefactors. 26 But you are not to be like that. Instead, the greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who rules like the one who serves.

  • Anyone who wants to be first must be the very last, and the servant of all.

  •  Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children,  and live in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God

Obviously, verses in the Bible about submission of women to their husbands were written in the context of a time in history and a society in which women did not have equality.  Sure they say that the husband is the head of the wife.  This was the way things were back then.  It was a time and a society in which women had no rights, people owned slaves, customs were different.   It’s fascinating (and not in a good way) that we are able to adjust our understanding and are able to see pretty clearly that verses about slavery, or other customs like eating meat sacrificed to idols, or covering the head during worship, do not translate literally for modern times, but the same kind of common sense is not applied to verses that describe women’s societal roles. 

Even so, if you read the verses in full, it is clear that the picture that is being painted promotes an attitude of mutual submission and respect to one another.  In addition to telling women to be submissive they say:

Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.

and

Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 

Certainly a revolutionary idea for its time!  Not only does the writer ask women to be submissive, but he asks for the man to give himself up for her as Christ did for people and to submit mutually.   Surely this idea for its time promoted women and offered them a degree of status and equality that their society did not.   The verse was meant to move women ahead.

It is tragic that 2000 years later, Christianity – the very movement that set them light years ahead in the area of equality – that is now setting them light years back. 

You know what the “s” word for that is?  Shame. 

To Comment, click on the title of this post “Girl Talk Part 6 - The “S” Word”

Girl Talk - Part 5 - Soul mates

soul mates.jpg

All have shaped my soul.

In continuing my “Girl Talk” series, let’s talk about soul mates. As you know, I solicited input from women asking them what life advice they received, that they found to be toxic. Some of the women I heard from talked about how toxic the idea of a soul mate had been to them. 

I looked it up in the dictionary  

soul mate

/ˈsōl ˌmāt/

noun

plural noun: soulmates

1.      a person ideally suited to another as a close friend or romantic partner.

 

“Ideally suited to one another” sounds pretty non-threatening and non-toxic by definition.  And yet most people have a much more emotionally charged idea of the soul mate.  The soul mate is often thought of as one person out there that is your one true love, your prince charming, “the one god has for you.” 

This idea of a soul mate can be a pretty heavy burden.  It’s a lot of pressure to think that you have this one shot to find the ONE. 

What if you never find them? 

What if you miss your opportunity?

How will you know when it’s “the one?” 

What if you misjudge it and end up with someone who isn’t “the one?”  

One website I read said, “Your soulmate makes you feel entirely whole, healed and intact, like no piece is missing from the puzzle.”   

Wait…. what?????

I went through years of therapy to learn that no person can make me feel whole, healed and intact.  It was my job to become whole and bring that whole person into the relationship.  Two halves don’t make a whole – two wholes make a whole.  

As a girl, I was raised on fairy tales and romance novels.  I bought into the soul-mate myth and when I was sixteen I met him.  Love at first site, intense, passionate.  We could finish one another’s sentences, we could finish each other’s jokes, we knew what the other one was thinking without even having to say anything.   We married young and were completely confident that we were soul-mates.   And maybe we were for that moment in time, as young-love teenagers, and yet we weren’t whole and complete, so the whole thing fell apart.  We expected the other one to fill the void, to fulfill the dream of happily ever after, but that’s not how happily ever after works.  

Happily ever after isn’t about riding off into the sunset with someone who makes you feel whole, healed and intact, it’s about being with someone who takes responsibility for their own wholeness and healing and shares that journey honestly with you.  That journey with someone is messy.  It’s filled with beauty and also with conflict, boredom, and irritation.  It’s mundane.  It’s being OK with the fact that sometimes you can’t stand how much you love them and sometimes you just can’t stand them.  

If your idea of a soul mate is this one magical person who will come into your life, sweep you off your feet and fill your every desire, when the day-in, day-out of life rubs the shine off the relationship, and your every desire is not being fulfilled, you might just start thinking you’re with the wrong person.  You might start believing that you made  a mistake and missed your soul-mate.  You might start looking around thinking that your TRUE soul-mate is out there somewhere.  And you will miss the beauty of the real-life love that’s right in front of you. 

If there are soul-mates, I like the idea that they are simply people that come into our lives and touch our souls in some way. 

Friends, encounters, siblings, children, parents, lovers. 

I’ve had many soul mates.  Some have come into my life and left again.  Some have stayed.  All have changed me in one way or another.  All have shaped my soul. 

“When you meet that person. a person. one of your soulmates. let the connection. the relationship. be what it is. it may be five minutes. five hours. five days. five months. five years. a lifetime. five lifetimes. let it manifest itself the way it is meant to be. it has an organic destiny. this way it stays or if it leaves. you will be softer. from having been loved this authentically. souls come into. return. open. and sweep through your life for a myriad of reason. let them be who. and what they are meant to be."      -Nayyirah Waheed

To comment, click on the title of this post “Girl Talk - Part 5 - Soul mates”

Girl Talk - Part 3 - Paint the Barn Door

19-Makeup-Disasters-That-Actually-Defy-Belief.jpg

It means to put on make-up.

In the FB group where I asked women for the best, most toxic phrases they’ve been given as girl advice, one woman posted that she was taught that woman should be sure to “paint the barn door” before their husbands get home from work. 

Several of us had to ask what that even meant, so she enlightened us.  It means to put on make-up. 

Not only is this supposed to be good advice for women, it’s supposed to be someone’s idea of good “Christian” advice for women. I guess they didn’t read the verse that says that our beauty is not supposed to come from “outward adornment.”

What is the purpose of advice of this type?  It is a message of control.   If we make ourselves as beautiful as we can, we will “keep our man.”  We are in control. 

There are so many versions of this out there.  Some years ago, I was in a women’s bible study, in which the writer of the course said she always makes sure her make up is on and hair is done before her husband leaves in the morning so that the last image he has of her is one of beauty.  This, she stated, would help him resist temptation when he encountered beautiful women “out there” because he would remember he had a beautiful woman at home. 

Is that the kind of society we want to create?!  A world where men are helpless and we hold control over them with our beauty?    Maybe, for some, it is. 

This kind of quest for control comes at a price.  The notion that women are in control of men’s sexual behaviors is one of the issues in rape culture.  A woman is asked, “what were you wearing?” “why were you in that place?” etc… as though she could have controlled the situation with her appearance or behavior.  We cannot expect to put forth messages that perpetuate the myth that women are responsible for men’s sexual behavior, and not expect a backlash in which victims of sexual misconduct are blamed. 

This way of thinking does men such a disservice as well.  Imagine if you were raised with the message that the way another person LOOKED would cause you to either behave well, or badly.  How out of control would you feel?   One woman in the discussion said her husband felt that this type of a message is demeaning to men – and he’s right!  This message of disempowerment is as destructive to men as it is to women. 

Another problem with this type of a message is it makes sexuality about fear and control.  The hidden message is, “I’m afraid my husband will cheat.  I need to do something about it.  I can control his fidelity with my beauty. I need to put on make-up, get a boob-job, diet more, get collagen fillers, botox” ……. and the list never ends because if a little control is good, more is even better.   As long as we operate from this mindset, we can expect that our sex lives will be about fear and control, and not about love and intimacy.   

My first husband was unfaithful.  When we were going through counseling, I tried and tried to figure out what I had done or not done, and what I could do or not do to prevent it.  Maybe if I had been more of this, less of that; prettier, thinner, – something. 

Anything. 

Maybe if I had prayed more or better.  Maybe …… 

And make no mistake, he tried to convince me it was my fault as well. 

I attended a support group at the time and looked around at the array of spouses who had been betrayed;  smart, not-smart, successful, unsuccessful, beautiful, not so beautiful, thin, not thin.  Their stories were as varied as they were.   There was no pattern to it.  It seemed that pretty much anyone could be betrayed for any reason whatsoever or for no reason at all.   My therapist asked me this question, “would there have been anything he could have done or not done that would have caused you to cheat?”  I knew the answer was no and then I knew that there was nothing I could have done or not done that would have kept him faithful.  His behavior belonged to him.  

You would think this would have been a relief and in one way it was, but in another it was not.  As long as I thought there was something I could DO (i.e paint the barn door or something), I had some shred of control.   Once I realized there was nothing I had done or could do, I felt no control whatsoever.   Then, and only then, did I understand the nature of love.  Love is freely given, without trying to control the other person.  You hope the person will love you back, for who you are and not for your paint-job.  You hope they will stay with you as your paint starts to crack and peel, but, sometimes they don’t, and your heart breaks.  

….but, there is someone who will. 

To comment, click on the title of this post: “Girl Talk - Part 3 - Paint the Barn Door”

#metoo - part 5 - Narratives

Narrative2.jpg

What about just existing in the "I am" space? It feels more free there.

I was recently in a discussion where it was stated that we need a new male narrative in our culture.   This is true.

But it got me thinking about narratives and what my experiences have been with them.   I’ve been thinking about the narratives that were given to me, the narratives I have given myself and continue to give myself.   And I’ve been thinking about the new narratives I need as well. 

An online search says that narratives:

·         Help us to describe and define our identities, values, and relations to the world.

·         Create a sense of order and expectations from the overwhelming data of experience; and provide models for solving problems.

·         are the kind of stories a people—a nation, an ethnic or minority group within that nation, a gender, a band of pilgrims—tell about themselves.

And each of us has our own narrator in the brain, providing us with narratives about just about everything we experience; what things are, what they mean, how they measure up, and so on.   These narratives FEEL real and true, but they are simply subjective. 

And regardless of whether they are subjective or not, narratives can be positive or toxic.  They can produce both positive and negative behaviors in individuals and societies.  If my cultural narrative values individuality and achievement and yours values homogeneity and equality, we will have two very different results in both the culture and the individual.  And each of us will feel that our own outcome is superior.

My culture gave me some narratives.  It told me that the sky was the limit, and if I dreamed it, I could do it.  This was the classic “American dream” narrative.   My dad told me I could do anything I set my mind to do.  A similar narrative and one he absolutely believed in. 

The trouble with both of these narratives is that they are just not true.   While I recognize that as a white, upper-middle class female I had more chance of them being true than most – they still were not true.  The narrative told me there were no limits, but there were.  Financial limitations, social limitations, intellectual limitations.  I would have loved to have been a quantum physicist, but no matter how hard I try, I just don’t have THAT type of a brain.

I passed the “you can be anything you want to be” narrative on to my kids.  When my son was two or three, we were driving and he began to cry suddenly and inconsolably from his car seat in the back.  I asked him what was wrong and he said, “I’ll NEVER be a bird!!!”  I was confused at first, then realized that he had just realized that the "you can be anything you want to be" narrative I had given him just was not true.  No matter how hard he tried in life, he would never be a bird; he would always be a human. 

When I was twenty, the narrator in my brain told me I weighed too much.  I weighed 105 pounds and wanted to get back down to 100.  When I was thirty, the same narrator told me I weighed too much.  I weighed 128 pounds and wished I could get down to 110.  When I was forty, the same narrator told me that if could only get down to 125 pounds I would look perfect.  I weighed 135.   And now?  The same narrator tells me that 135 would be perfect.    Clearly the weight narrator has no objective standard. 

With gender narratives, the cultural narrative was confusing and ambiguous for me.  Imagine if it was confusing and ambiguous for a straight, white female, what it must be like for so many others!!!

On the one hand, my culture told me I was equal to men.  But the truth was - I wasn’t. 

Other conflicting narratives were given.  Women should be quiet and gentle.  If not, we are bitches.   We should be smart, but not too smart or we will intimidate men and threaten their egos and perhaps be undesirable to them.    We should pursue our interests, but only if they do not interfere with the interests of others.  We should take care of ourselves, but only after we have taken care of others first.  We should be desirable, but chaste.  We should maintain our bodies so that they are desirable to men, but we should not be a slut.  We are responsible for the sexuality of men.   These narratives came through my family upbringing, my religion and my society. 

Here are some of the words of those narratives that echo in my soul:

·         “Your beauty should …come from the inner disposition of your heart, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is precious in God’s sight.

·         “No one will buy the cow if the milk is for free”

·         “If you wear that, you are going to cause men to lust.  You will just be asking for it.”

·         “The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband.”

·         “Wow, she’s really let herself go.”

·         “Don’t come across too strong, you might want to tone it down a little. “

·         “Stop being so emotional”

·         “If you’re always in the driver’s seat, no one else needs to be.”

·         “If you never say “no” to your husband, he will never have any reason to look elsewhere.”

·         “You are so lucky to have a husband who helps around the house.”

·         “It’s great that you’re dating again, but you don’t want to get a reputation as a slut.”

·         “Now that you’re single again, you need to work on your body.”

·         “Smile!”

There is a great twitter feed called @manwhohasitall .   In it, narratives are flipped to point out just how alarming or ridiculous many of them are.  Here are some examples:

·         “MEN!  Accentuate parts of your body you like, e.g. nice face , to draw attention away from the problem areas.

·         “My boss respects men.  She thinks they are every bit as equal as women.  She’s great.  I’m so lucky”

·         “The word sportswomanship is obviously gender-neutral and covers both women and men.  The world has way too many problems to be offended by language”

·         “MEN!  If you speak up in a meeting and want to be taken seriously, wear a neat hairstyle, a bold color close to your face and don’t forget to lean in.”

·         “To all smart men.  Don’t act dumb around women!  It’s OKAY to be a man and be smart.  Some women actually find it attractive. “

·         “PRO TIP:  If you struggle to get your wife to do her share of the childcare, it could be that you use the wrong tone of voice or you criticize too much.”

·         “Talking to men is a minefield.  You have to avoid touching them, even the young and handsome ones.  Have I got that right?”

·         “I actually don’t mind looking after the kids for an hour or so for my husband.”

·         “Can sports provide a way for boys to see their bodies as powerful rather than flawed?” 

You get the point and it’s a point well made.  Check out his twitter feed or his book. 

Of course these have all been examples of where narratives are untrue and damaging, but narratives aren’t all bad.  

If we give our children a strong narrative about who they are, where they come from and where they are going, that’s important.  If we give one another strong, positive narratives about who we are – that’s huge. 

But even positive narratives contain within themselves the ability for great harm.  The American dream narrative may inspire a person to rise up and make something more of their life, but it also led to manifest destiny and genocide, to the raping of the environment, and to any number of crimes against humanity based on greed.  It can lead to shame and despair for those who believe it is true and just cannot seem to make it happen in their own lives.

So to return to the idea I mentioned at the beginning of this post of a “new male narrative”, in the discussion about this “new male narrative” and what it should be, someone mentioned that Jesus was the ultimate human and did not have a male or female narrative and perhaps this should be the goal instead. 

Immediately, there was a defensive reaction from some who stated we shouldn’t be trying to do away with our male and female differences.   We need strong positive narratives for whatever gender role we identify with.

And I agree.   We shouldn’t try to do away with whatever gender identity we have, and for that we may need positive and life-giving narratives.

And yet, for me, where a gender narrative is concerned, I have difficulty with it.  I personally, don’t want a narrative that is about my female-ness.  I mistrust narratives.  They have not served me well.   I don’t like the way it feels to have a specific narrative for any of the categories and labels that might be attached to me;  female, heterosexual, mom, introverted, sister, scientist, wife, INTJ, Enneagram 5.  I don’t want to be known as a set of categories or narratives, regardless of how positive they may be.   I want to be known as me, Heather.  Not as a narrative.  I want to learn how to move through the world as me, Heather, rather than based on narratives that come from without or within.   

And even that is impossible.  Who is Heather?  She isn’t the same today as yesterday and will not be the same today as tomorrow.

So is an authentic and non-limiting narrative possible?

In our discussion, someone said that the true human narrative, the real non-limiting narrative is the Christ narrative.     Even though Jesus was male and thus had male differences, and probably male narratives, the CHRIST was a different thing and was the ultimate narrative.  

So I’ve been thinking that over.  Is the Christ consciousness the true narrative? 

The Christ consciousness is neither male nor female, neither slave nor free, neither Jew nor Gentile. 

The Christ consciousness was in the beginning and was called the “word” or more literally, the” logos”, the logic, the story, or we could say, the “narrative”. 

The Christ consciousness is the “I am”, which is a great narrative.  Since who we are yesterday is different than who we are now, and who we are now is different than who we will be in the future, the only thing we ever really are who we are at this moment.  The “I am”. 

Those things that make us "male" or "female"; "masculine" or "feminine" are not the Christ consciousness.  They are culture, and biology, and preference, and inclination, and socialization and power structures, systems of meaning and narratives.

As humans, we over-identify with things of the ego, of the flesh, of this world.  We over-identify with our emotions, our thoughts, our bodies, our past, our future, our experiences, and our narratives.   

So it seems to me that perhaps the Christ consciousness is that part of me that transcends all of that.  It is that part of me that is neither male nor female, mom nor child, old nor young, introvert nor extrovert.  It seems to me that it is simply ego that causes me to need to defend my masculinity or femininity or come up with narratives.  What about just stepping outside all that?  What about just opting out of a narrative altogether and just existing in the "I am" space?  

It feels more free there .

(To comment, click on header)

 

#Metoo - part 2

guns.jpg

"We expect and demand that women be patient, nurturing, forgiving, healing, self-effacing and self-sacrificing.  Women are expected to be nonviolent in a violent male society"

In Richard Rohr’s book “Simplicity” he writes: 

“In the patriarchal view (1) all relationships are eventually defined in terms of superiority and inferiority, and (2) the all-important need for order and control is assured by the exercise of dominative power…..(this) has served to dehumanize and therefore despiritualize generations of races, nations, professions, women, sexual minorities, handicapped people, the weak and the elderly whom the powerful are able to disparage culturally and dismiss as being of no account.  Not only are the rich and powerful able to project their own darkness onto such groups, but the group normally accept that darkness as their true value. “

Historically, in many ways, women have been blamed for and have often accepted the responsibility for sexual dominance, control and abuse at the hands of men.

  • At a party recently, my friend was kissed without her consent by a man who was not her husband "because she was so beautiful"
  • As a teen, I was given the advice that if a woman never said no to her husband, he would never have a reason to "look elsewhere". 
  • My daughters were cautioned as teens to dress only in certain ways or they might cause boys to "stumble" and lust.  
  • When the news was full of stories of sexual harassment recently, my 84 year old mom recently responded with “after all …. the way women dress these days”
  • In a ladies Bible study 15 years ago, the woman who produced the video series said that she got up every morning and put on make-up and rolled her hair before her husband left for work.  She did this so the last image he had of her as he left the house was one of beauty.  In this way, he would not be tempted by other women as he went through his day. 
  • In my first marriage, my husband told me he couldn't slow down sexually for me because I drove him "out of control".
  • When someone close to me was raped years ago, I was counseled by her therapist to not encourage her to press charges because the court process would be more of a rape than the rape itself.  

More from Rohr:

“without success (by his own definition) and control, the patriarch does not know who he is….such a life would not be worth living.   The language of patriarchy is always a noble or macho language of patriotism and freedom.  Men and their female echoes are always speaking it”

“Jesus would never have broken through (patriarchy)…if he had acted non-violently in a feminine body. ..because we expect and demand that women be patient, nurturing, forgiving, healing, self-effacing and self-sacrificing.  Women are expected to be nonviolent in a violent male society… but we are still not prepared for males or institutions or nations to act nonviolently.  That is why god had to become incarnate for us in the body of a man. “

If men can  blame women for and project their sexual impulses upon women, and women accept this blame/projection , then men need never come to terms with their sexual impulses and desires.  

 

(To comment, click on header)

#Metoo - part 1

metoo.jpg

Why don’t girls just tell guys to fuck off?

It had to happen.

I had to talk about women and sexual assault/ harassment.  There's so much to be said and it's hard to know where to begin so this will be a multi-part post.  These are all just things I've thought about or things that have made me think.  They are based on conversations I've had with men, with women, podcasts I've listened to, echoes of my past, and books I've read.  Names have been changed

#1  Why don’t girls just tell guys to fuck off?

Jim is a single, never-been-married, no kids guy.  Jim is artistic and free-spirited.  He is progressive on most social issues.  He votes democrat and is pretty passionate politically. He's nice looking, athletic, and popular with the ladies.  Jim and I had a long conversation about all the celebrities that were being outed. Part of what Jim said was the following:

"I just don’t get it.  When I was in college, and we were out at the bars, I would grab girl’s asses.  They liked it.  Usually, if I grabbed a girl’s ass, we would end up making out.  Lots of times she would go home with me.   I don’t get why, if a girl doesn’t like it she doesn’t just tell the guy to fuck off."

My reply was this, "Jim, imagine you are in a bar, and a guy who outweighs you by 100 pounds grabs your ass.  You know your odds of being sexually assaulted is 1 in 2.  Do you take the risk that this guy is or is not the type of guy that would assault you?  Do you risk pissing this guy off?  Do you take the risk he might follow you out to your car later and assault you because you’ve pissed him off?  Do you tell this guy to fuck off?"

Jim actually said yes to my question which I found interesting.  My daughters would probably tell the guy to fuck off too.  More power to them....but I wouldn’t.

I just ignore the guy. 

Some girls smile to try to avoid provoking the guy.

Apparently, according to Jim's account of his college days, some girls end up making out with the ass-grabber.  I suspect these are girls who had been admiring Jim for a while and hoping to get noticed.  Who knows?  I can’t speak for them, but I tried to explain to Jim that culture has shifted.  Just because things were once ignored, or even accepted, doesn’t mean they should continue to be.  We can think of a million examples of this:  folks didn’t used to think anything of a man hitting his wife, or of separate drinking fountains for persons of color.  We used to have laws against birth control, and we didn’t have laws against drunk driving.  You get the point.   Culture evolves and changes, often for the better.  Grabbing someone’s ass without their consent just isn’t OK.  It never was, but many just weren’t tuned into it.   Sure, we should have been responding with a “fuck-off” all along.  But we didn’t and many times we still don’t.   And fundamentally, it's not the responsibility of the victim to correct the problem.  

Because we are still afraid. 

It made me think of my dog Clyde.  The other day he was sniffing and smelling at his dog-buddy Bert’s dog bed and then humping it. You see, Bert used to let Clyde hump him all the time.  I have no idea if Bert allowed the humping because Bert thought it was good fun, or if it was because Bert was afraid of Clyde.  Clyde is a 110 lb dog.  He outweighs Bert by 40 pounds and is pretty intimidating.  Clyde has always been the alpha and Bert has always submitted. But sometime during the past year, Bert has decided he’s had enough.  When Clyde tries to hump him, Bert goes ape crazy.  In his dog-way, Bert is telling Clyde to just fuck off.   Poor Clyde is understandably confused.  Bert always seemed to like the humping-play before.  It was all in good fun from Clyde’s perspective.   And now things have changed and Clyde has accepted that.  Bert has stopped giving his consent.   So now, Clyde just humps the bed.

Post script:  I was talking to my daughter the other night about this post.   She told me this story.  She was walking down the street one day and the wind caught her skirt.  A guy on the street saw it and walked past her and told her that was "hot" or "sexy" or something like that.   Ordinarily, she will tell a guy to fuck off.  My daughters are feisty.  But she didn't.  She froze.  I asked her why.  She said it was because she actually felt threatened that day on that street by that guy.   She said that usually when she tells someone to fuck off, she feels safe to do so.  She is surrounded by people, in public or similar.  In this situation she was alone...... and felt threatened.    

 

(To comment, click on header)